¨Time “t” brings otherness into evolution

Stefan G. Pierzynowski^{1, 2, 3} & Kateryna Pierzynowska^{1, 3, 4}

1. Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
2. Department of Medical Biology, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland
3. Anara AB, Trelleborg, Sweden
4. Department of Animal Physiology The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jabłonna, Poland

Astract

Even though atoms are essentially ‘just atoms’ i.e. commonly they are the same particular elements, they must be different considering different time of their appearance (“t”). Thus, the individual molecules which are formed by the appearance of a distinct selection of atoms, at a specific moment in time (“t”), must be also different. In short, the distinct selection of ‘not identical’ atoms, of the same kind, must appear to make up different molecules, different genes and in the end different creatures.

To Chemists

Different protons (H) were created from quanta (and then later from these protons other molecules/distinct selections of atoms were formed). Pb was created from Pu during an essentially ‘anti-genesis’ process, i.e., through processes of half-decay with different durations for each separate atom. The divagation on time role in evolution of the mattery is crutiakl since the half-decay process can take anything from a fraction of a second up to millions of years. It is logical that the atoms appearing from C14 at the beginning of half decay should be and in fact are different from those appearing 5730 years later. Thus, these distinct selections of atoms, as well as their substrates (quants), were and still are different by virtue of the component of time (“t”), through which Nature essentially exists. Time is a somewhat flexible structure of Nature, and the Universe as a whole, not merely an attribute of it! Time is an immanent and crucial part of Nature. Any form of genesis or decay—which in a sense is ‘anti-genesis’, can’t happen at “0” time, as under such circumstances nothing would in fact have happened. Thank goodness this "big-bang" is still ongoing for almost 14 billion years.

To Physicists

Most important in all of this, is the role played by quants, quarks, gluons, string, twistors, etc., which are also different from each other for the same reason that if they weren't different, nothing would come into being. These “t” related quants simply wouldn't exist, and to ensure their existence, they must also be different. A trivial statement quantum (photon) of yellow light is different from a red quantum (photon) in the white light spectrum.

Without these “t” related differences, neither point 1 above, nor the rest below would make any sense – since they wouldn’t exist! Nota bene! Non-existence is not a vacuum. A vacuum is itself a strange existing entity. Therefore, difference in all existing entities is the most essential, primary attribute of everything that exists which is created by “t”. Is true? – and it is! – then its component quants, atoms, molecules, and finally minerals and their most perfect form-life-are also different because of “t”.

To Biologists

Every molecule is different, even those which are essentially ‘the same’! No two molecules, atoms, or quanta are alike!!

And now the important thing – for a thinking biologist: every single gene should be and in fact is different from others of the same kind. Physicists should focus on the diversity of quants, not their strangeness, because these quants, are not strange at all, but different.

And even further – although it's visible at every step! – to the naked eye without any machine – biological or physical detector! Every living individual is different.

And now the furthest thing: The same, yet different genes, ensure that individuals choose different atoms and different molecules for their structure, etc. Not bene AI (artificial intelligence – the machine wisdom) can’d do it – thou is not intelligent.

To All

The entire point (i.e., point 9) of biology and, above all, of evolution. That is, the selection of the best, most efficient atomic-molecular-vacuum assemblies for building genes. This could explain the paradox that rat and human genetic material only formally differ by between 1-2%, in terms of differences in purine-pyrimidine bases. However, they are in fact significantly different overall. These differences come about due to differences at the level of the atoms from which genes are built. Of course, such differences at the subatomic, quants level are terminally smaller, but they do exist. Thus, genes are built from different nucleic bases, ribose, and phosphoric acid. Thus, it is logical that the final components of genes arise due to the molecular selection of the best components for the formation of species-specific genes, and related tissues. This ‘natural selection’ (a term which I, personally dislike immensely) is the fruit of Charles Darwin's genuine genial work, which forms the basis of the meaning of evolution for living creatures. Of course, there must also be selection of better or different quants or atoms that arose at different times. Therefore, “t” is also a building block of both Darwinian evolution and the panevolution; sub-atomic (quants, quarks, gluons, etc.), atomic and molecular levels (etc.) that I’m describing. I was under the impression that this evolution was no more—and yet, as of today, it is in existence!! Now I'm beginning to understand why life actually exists (or how it was created by evolution and the factor of time - “t”).

The purpose of evolution is to organize the world towards the best form it can possibly be. This form doesn't have to be, and certainly isn't, that of humankind. Humankind is only the last form of matter at the present moment, which has turned out to be a super-destructive lifeform indeed (a poorly successful form). Humankind likely only survived by evolutionary “accident”. Soon, it will destroy the entire work of biological evolution-all the purposeful “gifts” of evolution, such as oil, gas, coal-and we'll have to start all over again-see point 5.

If only physicists could achieve a similar understanding of material, or history will laugh at them to the teeth.

It's already starting to snort in places, when mathematical physicists meditate teleologically in places of prayer-e.g., see Sir Roger Panrose with Prof. Krzysztof A. Meisner in the Cathedral in Czerwińsk (Pl). Sic! Have they run out of ideas or thinking?

We are sure that some physicists and very few biologists will agree with my thinking (described above) regarding quants and the orchestra of atoms in the pan-evolutionary process under time (“t”). On the other hand, they must start thinking this way at some point in time, because the ‘Main World Equation’ by Mr. Alfred Einstein should be more flexible and complex for physics, chemist and biologist when  include “t” . Becoming the same for all living and dead matter, i.e., for all quanta, atoms, molecules,  genes, etc. Let’s start with: 

                                                       E ^(t0) ¹  E ^(tn)           

E _(0…...n) = t _(0…...n) ^. m _{(0…. n)} ^. C²

Probably then both the constants: “h” (Max Planck) and the “Uncertainty Principle” (Werner Heisenberg) would have a better background.

Edited by Dr. Janine Donaldson (Department of Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa)

Reference

See – AI (artificial intelligence) statements in Google – on request can be provided.